Is Seeking Vengeance Good or Bad?
- Leroy Hayes

- Oct 15, 2025
- 4 min read
Updated: 21 hours ago
The Instinct for Balance
Vengeance is as old as mankind. It predates kings, courts, and commandments. Long before men wrote laws, they understood retribution. If someone burned your home, you burned his. If he killed your kin, you took his life. What we now call vengeance was once understood as balance. Primitive, brutal balance.
And though civilization has changed our tools and language, the impulse remains. When someone wrongs you, a voice deep inside demands repayment. That voice doesn’t speak in reason, it speaks in blood.
People like to pretend we’ve outgrown vengeance, that forgiveness is higher and more evolved. But anyone who’s ever been betrayed, humiliated, or robbed of something sacred knows forgiveness doesn’t come naturally. It’s an uphill battle. The first instinct isn’t peace.
It's fury.
When Vengeance Serves Justice
There are times when vengeance is a necessity. When evil thrives unchecked, vengeance becomes the final word of justice.
Few stories illustrate this more clearly than Rome’s war against Carthage.
Carthage was wealthy, powerful, and utterly depraved. Its priests fed infants into the open jaws of Moloch, a brass idol heated until it glowed red. Drums thundered to drown out the screams while the city’s elites watched in supposed piety. Rome saw that and made a decision. Carthage wasn't a rival to be defeated. It was something unholy to be erased.
When the Third Punic War ended, Rome offered no peace. The city was burned to ash, the fields salted, and its name condemned to never rise again. To modern eyes, that seems excessive. In its own time, it was the sword of right action swung without hesitation.
Some cultures are too sick to redeem. Some acts cannot coexist with civilization. Rome’s vengeance was a cleansing. They understood something we’ve forgotten: mercy toward monsters isn’t virtue; it’s surrender.
That’s the righteous side of vengeance: when it punishes evil so that evil knows fear. It restores equilibrium when diplomacy fails. It reminds men that actions have consequences.
When Vengeance Becomes Poison
But vengeance is a double-edged sword. Wield it too long and you start cutting yourself. What begins as justice can curdle into obsession. A man can lose himself pursuing retribution. The longer he fixes his gaze on his enemy, the more he becomes what he hates.
Even Rome, the great purifier, paid that price. Their victory over Carthage gave them unmatched power, but it also removed the limits that had shaped it. The Senate still stood, laws still existed, but restraint had lost its anchor. With no rival left to measure against, the force that once defended civilization turned inward. Rome began devouring itself through purges, betrayals, and civil wars.
What failed wasn’t law, but direction. Authority no longer served survival or order. It fed ambition. Vengeance, once wielded to protect the world Rome had built, became an instrument of power for its own sake.
Power without an external limit doesn’t rest. Without discipline, it turns the blade inward.
The same danger confronts every man who lets vengeance live too long in his heart. It grows roots. You stop acting for justice and start living for the memory of being wronged.
You begin to believe you’re punishing the world, when all you’re really doing is keeping your wound open.
At that point, vengeance weakens you. It ties your future to your enemy’s name. And when that enemy no longer cares, you’re still chained to the past, carrying his ghost.
The Formidable View
Vengeance isn’t moral or immoral. It’s power. And like all power, it reveals the character and discipline of the man who wields it.
In the hands of the disciplined, vengeance is order restored. In the hands of the reckless, it’s complete chaos. The difference lies in command.
A weak man seeks vengeance to soothe his pride.
A strong man seeks it only when justice demands it; and only long enough to finish the task.
Once it’s done, he walks away. He doesn’t gloat, doesn’t linger, doesn’t keep reopening the scar.
To live under the Formidable Ideal is to master that line. You don’t preach forgiveness when it’s cowardice, and you don’t pursue vengeance when it’s vanity. You weigh both in the furnace of reason and let the blade fall only when it must.
The goal isn’t to feel better. It’s to be right and to stand in alignment with the greater order you claim to serve.
Rome’s lesson is eternal. Their vengeance against Carthage was justified because it defended civilization. But when that same spirit turned inward, it destroyed the very empire it once built.
That’s what happens when vengeance loses its aim.
Final Judgment
So, is vengeance good or bad? It depends on the hand, the cause, and the command behind it.
If you can strike and still sleep with a clear conscience, perhaps vengeance served its purpose.
If you strike and feel empty, it was never justice. It was ego.
The truth is, most men aren’t ready to wield vengeance.
They think it will free them, but it binds them tighter than before.
Vengeance must serve order or it will destroy everything it touches.




Comments